Identifies and discusses one of the Conceptual Framework dimensions | Often presents substantive, accurate, and thoughtful analysis of the selected dimension | Inaccurate or incomplete analysis of the dimension Dimension not clearly identified or discussed |
Provides specific examples of how one’s experience and character speak to the identified dimension | Often makes clarifying personal connections that illuminate and add depth to the dimension being discussed | Makes few or no personal connections; Often fails to establish the relevance of personal connections to the dimension |
Writing demonstrates command of conventions of standard English (e.g., grammar, usage, capitalization, punctuation, spelling) | Contains few or no errors in conventions
| Often demonstrates partial or uneven command of language usage/grammar, punctuation, conventions or an inattention to conventions |
Writing clarity and style | Writing is clear, descriptive, and cohesive Contains precise, thoughtful wording that furthers ideas and logic. May include examples and definitions to support reader Demonstrates a crafted style, consistent with expectations for pre-professional teachers | The writing is difficult to discern or its logic difficult to follow Sometimes demonstrates unclear, imprecise, inappropriate, or incoherent language Inattention to the effect of words and language on one’s reader |
